Search for: "State v. $18,000"
Results 141 - 160
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Opponents of DOMA point to the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Opponents of DOMA point to the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
The appellants' lawyer filed the required certification, stating that his brief contained 13,877 words. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Plaintiffs in Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:12 pm
The appellants' lawyer filed the required certification, stating that his brief contained 13,877 words. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
In Oscar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 5:58 pm
" Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:56 pm
The reference is non-existent.The release also states: Ten to 15 orders was all IBM envisioned for the computer in 1949. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:43 am
Case Background In Navarro et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:45 pm
From Dinkins v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Compensation of £18,000 each was a warded to the first and second claimants. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:30 am
He assured them that the material was going to an overseas market where no one from the United States would view it. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Posted by John LewisA divided Sixth Circuit panel affirmed the district court decision in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Deegan, 251 N.Y. 467 (1929) to settle on a doctrine essentially similar to Wickard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm
Rent £18,000 pa (£1500 per month). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
The problem with barring those with conviction records, as explained by the United States Supreme Court in Griggs v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
* Eponia: a State of mind? [read post]
