Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 141 - 160
of 701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
American, Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees today. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
In Football Dataco Ltd v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
In Football Dataco Ltd v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
The first of these was Pfeifer v Austria (Judgment of 15 November 2007), followed by Petrina v Romania (Judgment of 14 October 2008), Petrenco v Moldova (Judgment of 30 March 2010) and, more recently, Popovski v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
The Court prepared this step in Simon v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
As regards the latter, prosecution was brought under the Obscene Publications Act 1959 (R v Penguin Books Ltd [1961] Crim LR 176). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:07 am
The Court has recently returned to the matter in two judgments: Alm v Austria [2022] ECHR Application no. 20921/21 and Sager and Others v Austria [2022] ECHR Application no. 61827/19. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Reed cites a nice example, Schmidberger Internationale v Austria (Case C-112/00) [2003] ECR I-5659. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:11 am
He is teaching both in Hungarian and English language at the Szeged Law School, and he has delivered lectures at universities in Finland, the United States, France, Germany and Russia, and presented papers on conferences in Hungary, Germany, Canada, United States, Austria, Finland, Indonesia and France. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:32 pm
Austria and Krone Verlag GmbH v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
Austria (application no. 39534/07 and my case comment), the majority of the UK Supreme Court rejected the argument that there was such an Article 10 right (see Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
In relation to inadmissible evidence the Court stated that the Board of Appeal rightly upheld the Cancellation Division’s decision on whether the applicant had adduced evidence of Red Bull’s actual knowledge of the use of the contested mark in Austria. and rejected the Asolo’s argument.Similarity between alcoholic drinks and energy drinksThe second plea, related to likelihood of confusion, which requires similarity between both the marks at issue and the class of… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:23 pm
The court is determining “whether consistent with this Court’s decision in Republic of Austria v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where evidence was… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The relevant Strasbourg authorities on this include Albert v Belgium (A/58) (1983) 5 EHRR 533 ECHR, Ruiz-Mateos v Spain (A/262) (1993) 16 EHRR 505 ECHR, Lizzarraga v Spain (2007) 45 EHRR 1031 and Ringeisen v Austria (No 1) (1971) 1 EHRR 455. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Berg v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Docket No. 20-1765
17 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
Republic of Austria, 142 F. [read post]
