Search for: "State v. BOMBER" Results 141 - 160 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
” US Central Command released a statement saying that US forces on Tuesday continued attacks on ISIS using “fighter and bomber aircraft to conduct six airstrikes. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Tragic news out of Yemen: a suicide bomber reportedly blew himself up in a crowd of protesters, killing approximately 70 people. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[Yes]BOMBER GEAR for Dry Clothing Confusable With BOMBER(S) for Hats and Shirts, Says TTABFame of NAUTICA Mark Yields 2(d) Opposition Victory over NAUTI LIFE for ClothingOPROSHIELD and SHIELD Confusingly Similar for Mouth Guards, Says TTABTTAB Finds Confusing Similarity Between "Paw" Design and "KELME & Paw Design" For ClothingTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are READR and READER Confusable for Software for Reading Digital Magazines? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
In other news, the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
When backed into a corner, the government’s apologists cite the capture of Zazi, the so-called New York subway bomber. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:51 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Thursday, February 13, 2014:My post today @SlawTips - Heenan and Hyriniak: Taking Stock(Part 1) Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:04 pm by Jane Chong
Holder, Jr. authorized the government to seek the death penalty in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Zachary Eddington
” As to the constitutional issues, Tsarnaev does not challenge the government’s claim that the deferential standard from Florence v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Zachary Eddington
Here, the government asks the court to apply the deferential standard from Florence v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
This is the first in a multi-part series exploring the legal significance of violent online rhetoric by individuals including the vile Bill Schmalfeldt. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:10 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The legislative history of Section 230 refers specifically to a New York state case — Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]