Search for: "State v. Barnes"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:09 pm
"From the WaPo article (by Robert Barnes):In 1969, the Supreme Court famously held in Tinker v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
One of the most anticipated decisions of this Supreme Court term—Fulton v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 5:31 am
Valqari LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:56 am
Last week, a state court judge in Orange County, California, declared the end of a landmark lawsuit called Campbell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:40 pm
” Today in Borden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:03 pm
The court evaluated Google’s Section 230 defense using the standard three-prong test as enunciated by the Ninth Circuit in Barnes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:03 pm
The court evaluated Google’s Section 230 defense using the standard three-prong test as enunciated by the Ninth Circuit in Barnes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 5:03 pm
The court evaluated Google’s Section 230 defense using the standard three-prong test as enunciated by the Ninth Circuit in Barnes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm
Rakusen v Jepson borne in mind. [read post]
17 May 2021, 9:42 am
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court to review Mississippi abortion law that advocates see as a path to diminish Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 8:16 am
United States, No. 20-5904. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:53 am
Drury v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:07 am
” The court says removing content is something publishers do (cite to Barnes v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:29 pm
Attorney Sia Baker-Barnes, partner at the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and Salesia V. [read post]
