Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 141 - 160
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Court held that: Decisions weighing the public interest in deportation against the private interest of the appellant and his family in his private and family life are often difficult and cannot easily be categorised as perverse” [§23] Lord Justice Longmore referred to MA (Somalia) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 49 when the Supreme Court reminded the Court of Appeal that it: should not be astute to characterise as an error of law what is no more than a… [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:51 am
” In Baro v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm
” and in which Carl notes the strong criticism of Mr Hemming by Wall LJ in RP v Nottingham (this is a blog post on which I commented at the time). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
As Baroness Hale put [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
On Friday, I did a podcast with Baroness Deech, Chair of The Bar Standards Board. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
Meanwhile, PCC Chair Baroness Buscombe gave a speech to the Westminster Media Forum on regulating privacy and online media, defending the role of the PCC in general and its privacy decisions in particular. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
It is right to state that some 18 months later, as part of an examination of material in the New York Times, the CPS signalled an intention hereon to take a broader view of the relevant legislation. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In a report of the hearing in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police, Channel 4 News notes disclosure the disclosure that the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) and its chairman paid £20,000 to lawyer Mark Lewis in settlement of his libel claim arising out of comments made by Baroness Buscombe. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 am
Professor Hargreaves states that the submissions must be "evidential", this word alone would put any hard working SME off. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Rix LJ also referred to the distinction drawn by Baroness Hale in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2007] 1 AC 224 between “the ordinary banter and badinage of life and genuinely offensive and unacceptable behaviour”. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Moreover, he rejected Baroness Hale’s doubts in a recent House of Lords case that consent could truly be act specific. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale made clear that the question for the local authority (following on from Birmingham CC v Ali – our note here) is essentially about the future, ie the probability of the acts continuing in the future (“This is the limiting factor. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
In interviews with housing officers, she complained of her husband’s behaviour, which included shouting in front of the children, and stated that she was scared that if she confronted him he might hit her. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Although Mr Seal ultimately lost, his claim – and in particular a strong dissenting judgment by Baroness Hale in the House of Lords – highlights the tricky line the state must tread in relation to people with mental health problems in relation to their access to justice. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
KJH v HGF [2010] EWHC 3064. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
In R. v. [read post]
