Search for: "State v. Bates" Results 141 - 160 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm by Jarod Bona
Ronwin); and (3) a board controlled by attorneys prohibits attorney advertising and deters attorneys from engaging in price competition (Bates v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am by CMS
All parties concerned will no doubt be awaiting the Supreme Court’s judgment with bated breath. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
This type of situation is what the Supreme Court was talking about in Bates v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm by Larkin Reynolds
When we last looked in on Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]