Search for: "State v. Bivens"
Results 141 - 160
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2008, 4:05 pm
From: Findlaw Legal Documents, August 12, 2008 Dismissal of CIA Leak Case Affirmed WILSON V. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 am
The claims against the officers were brought under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 1:14 pm
When Carlson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 485 (1994); see generally, Reexamining Bivens After Ziglar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:48 am
Br. at 24, Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
" Take, for example, an illegally alien put into state prison in an unconstitutional manner. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
See Bivens v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm
Justice Sotomayor questioned whether that could have been Congress’s intent, given that Bivens v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
After all, some of the retrenchment of Bivens in light of alternative remedies, including Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
He sued for damages under Bivens v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
He sued for damages under Bivens v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Himmelreich is when a court’s dismissal of an inmate’s Federal Tort Claims Act bars a parallel Bivens claim. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Maher Arar v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:17 am
The case, Brownback v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:18 am
Whether a conclusory allegation that a cabinet-level officer or other high-ranking official knew of, condoned, or agreed to subject a plaintiff to allegedly unconstitutional acts purportedly committed by subordinate officials is sufficient to state individual-capacity claims against those officials under Bivens.2. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:46 am
Minneci v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:11 pm
Further, it disregards the Supreme Court’s narrowing instructions on Bivens, which have limited recognition of new Bivens actions to those situations where, for one reason or another, damages were unavailable under both state and federal law. [read post]
