Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 141 - 160
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2011, 3:33 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a potentially important recent decision, Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 2:12 am
State courts have also taken up the challenge, the biggest development in 2006 being the City of Norwood v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:16 am
Bank v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:33 am
In Goldstein v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
In Centro Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 8:35 am
There are many situations where the state might want to lower the value of property by indefinitely banning development, so it can then take the property at a later date in order to use it for a public project, or even to transfer it to influential private interests under the guise of promoting “economic development” or alleviating blight. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:01 pm
Judge Sonia Sotomayor was asked for her opinion regarding Kelo v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:06 am
Gallenthin Realty v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Martin v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
The Court’s decision in Kelo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
That the Republican's have crippled the legal rights of citizens all over the country for decades to access the courts simply for political purposes is shameful and will be a blight on the party for years to come. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:05 pm
After Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
V Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 241 (1984)). [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
The “dual sovereignty” doctrine has been a blight on criminal law since Bartkus v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:26 am
Ct. of Appeals Oral Arguments in Kaur v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:47 pm
Today is the ninth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
The government can proscribe even temporary blight. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 11:31 pm
The action entitled Tuck It Away Associates L.P. v Empire State Development Corp. involves an attempt by the largest property owner impacted by the Columbia University proposal (along with others) to obtain documents from ESDC related to its proposal to implement the Columbia University project. [read post]
