Search for: "State v. Booth" Results 141 - 160 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm by Ken Lammers
The BIG FUSS this week has been about United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
This search was authorized by a warrant issued by a United States Magistrate Judge on April 11, 2009, based on an affidavit prepared by FBI Special Agent Nicholas G. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:39 pm
Not surprisingly, the group believes this amendment could result in legislation reversing Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 9 October 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Booth v The Parole Board, Osborn v The Parole Board, In the matter of an application of Reilly for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Al-Jedda. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
 In his NY Review essay, he also laments the fact that Payne overturned Booth v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Miss Booth cannot contend that the appellant’s article 5 right had been infringed. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:49 am by Sean Vanderfluit
Of note, at the outset of its analysis, the BCCA stated that in cases that did not involve final determination of a case that originated before the SCC issued Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm by Nicandro Iannacci
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
These provisions of Texas' self-defense laws generally track the laws in other U.S. states. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
A copy of the Kristin Booth Glen's opinion, published in the New York Law Journal, page 27, today, is available here and the front-page article is available here, and continued here.This ruling is consistent with a February 2008 New York appellate decision in Martinez v. [read post]