Search for: "State v. Borden" Results 141 - 160 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am by SHG
  Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:49 am by Moseley Collins
Borden, (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 836, 844, the court stated: The standard of skill, knowledge and care prevailing in a medical community is ordinarily a matter within the knowledge of experts. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Alabama: Lee's Divorce & Family Law Blog by Lee Borden, Esq. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 6:20 pm
Borden Larson appealed the decisions of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida that granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Correct Craft, Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Walker-Renshaw of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP presented her perpsective on the 2008 SCC decision, Mustapha v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Borden , No. 08-1625 Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant a sentence reduction where: 1) defendant's sentence was appropriate based upon his extensive criminal history and the need to protect society; and 2) the court did not erroneously rely upon its earlier decision not to resentence defendant as a the basis for the present denial. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Among the cases the Court refused on Monday to hear was a plea to clarify what public school teachers, coaches and staff may do, without violating the Constitution, when their students engage voluntarily in prayers at school (Borden v. [read post]