Search for: "State v. Bose "
Results 141 - 160
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
" Enbridge, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Class 46) Member States simplify international design registration system (WIPO) (Class 99) Greece Court of Appeal of Thessaloniki: Trying to claim damages in Greece: RP ABEE ALL DAY vs ALL DAY (Class 46) India Indian ‘Bayh Dole’ Bill keeps stirring a hornet’s nest (Spicy IP) India’s Bayh Dole: A blind legal transplant? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:38 am
Torres v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:49 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission:… [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Starting with the seminal case, Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Starting with the seminal case, Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:20 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
” Torres v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:11 am
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) decided In re Bose, a long-anticipated decision on what it takes to establish fraud before the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:05 pm
"He finds it "regrettable" that the AIPLA, passed a board resolution in 2007 critical of Medinol, and then filed "what can charitably be called a disingenuous amicus curiae brief in the appeal to the CAFC of Bose Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Precedential No. 13: TTAB Axes Fender Guitar Shapes, Finding Them Generic or Lacking Acquired DistinctivenessOwnership:Pam Chestek Ponders the Transfer of Common Law Trademarks under State LawTTAB Affirms Rejection of SOU filed by Assignor After AssignmentTTAB Resolves Santana's Ownership Dispute, But Pamela Chestek is DissatisfiedTTAB Finds No Trademark Rights in OEM Who Applied "WASTEMAID" Mark at Others' DirectionPriority:Precedential No. 16: TTAB Throws New England… [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:01 am
COA decides eminent domain case comes from The Indiana Lawyer.Relying on the Supreme Court of the United States case of Kelo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
"In Bose Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:11 pm
-based attorney George Patton Jr., of Bose McCKinney, represents Indiana's judicial qualifications commission in the similar case of Torrey Bauer, et al. v. [read post]
