Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 141 - 160 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
For Lord Briggs, this was a clear forfeiture clause. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by CMS
” Ultimately, however, Lord Briggs acknowledged that while there might be room to extend the lien to other legal service providers, th [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:31 am
And in Bentley Estate v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:41 pm
” Citing a 1948 case — Briggs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:25 am
The twitching was erroneous in Rocknroll v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Briggs last week that had no shake-rattle-and-roll in it at all. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm by CJLF Staff
  Bob Egelko of the SF Chronicle reports that the plaintiffs in Briggs v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Rose Falconer
  The federal judge issued a fiery dissent in 1951 in Briggs v Elliott, the first case that challenged racial segregation in schools, and this dissent formed the foundation of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown a few years later. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
However, Lord Briggs and Lord Leggatt reject Mr Basfar’s contention that the same is true of the trafficking and exploitation of a domestic worker by a diplomat. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
In Briggs v United States, it refers to the Feres Doctrine. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]