Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 141 - 160 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Generally speaking, Lord Carnwath – with whom Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Briggs concurred – held that Part 5A deliberately establishes an uncomplicated set of rules. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court on April 17, 2013 issued its opinion in McNeely v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  An appeal against a decision of Langstaff J  [2018] 3 WLR 691 17 or 18 October 2018, Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
  The case will be heard on 13 and 14 November 2018 by Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm by Brooke
Igo's The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America, Cyrus Farivar's Habeas Data: Privacy vs. the Rise of Surveillance Tech, Mary Ziegler's Beyond Abortion: Roe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Briggs giving the lead judgment, held that the principle of equivalence required that the procedural rules of member states applicable to claims based on EU law are no less favourable than those governing similar domestic claims [3]. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:12 am by Docket Navigator
"⁠During the pendency of [defendant's] appeal to the Federal Circuit, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am by CMS
Points to note As stated above, this is a significant judgement, so there is a lot to take on board. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:20 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The true scope of the elusive but all pervasive party autonomy doctrine was at the heart of the debate in the case of Rock Advertising Limited v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]