Search for: "State v. Buckman"
Results 141 - 160
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 3:34 am
In the ObTape Litigation, the manufacturer had moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs' claims to the extent they asserted a fraud-on-the-FDA theory, arguing that such a theory was preempted under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
” We may have an overriding preemption or standing argument under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:06 am
The strange case of Lockwood v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
The court properly finds that implied claim to be preempted under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Judicial hubris that ignores Buckman Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
. to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
The Court also cited to a District of North Carolina case, Buckman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
Buckman was premised on the notion that state laws, including state court jurors, are ill-equipped to second-guess the honesty of submissions to the FDA, and that such second-guessing would inevitably result in the FDA getting inundated with protective filings. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Slip op. at 12 (citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
Temple University Hospital, 566 Pa. 335, 340 781 A.2d 101, 104 (2001) (quoting Buckman Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
That decision is Mink v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 9:27 am
In its recent decision in the case of Buckman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 9:27 am
In its recent decision in the case of Buckman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:25 pm
” Buckman Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
In an (unfortunately) not-for-publication opinion, the 9th Circuit affirmed a defense summary judgment in Carson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:36 am
Smith-Kline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127, 130-31 (Mich. 2003).Following Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
Otherwise, private citizens may bring citizen's petitions to induce the Agency to act, but they cannot sue for alleged violations of the Act.The Supreme Court relied on §337(a) in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
