Search for: "State v. C. G. B."
Results 141 - 160
of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2010, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
C. 20543,pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES_________________Nos. 24–656 and 24–657_________________TIKTOK INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS24–656 v.MERRICK B. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
(g) Availability of Commodities. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
(§ 15064.7(c).) [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
See, e.g., Assoc. of Civilian Technicians v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Of those violations, the parties appear to agree that any of the following subsections in particular might apply here: (a)(2)(C), (a)(4), (a)(5)(B), or (a)(5)(C). [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Addressing another aspect of Petitioners' FOIL request, the Appellate Division observed that Petitioners had also sought FDNY "... records[] pertaining to cases initiated by the Bureau of Investigations and Trials ('BIT[S]')" . . . , including . . . details of all BIT[S] cases initiated against members of the FDNY, with a breakdown of each case identified by: [c]ase number; [b]ureau . . . ; [i]nfractions charged; [r]ace of charged party;… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Addressing another aspect of Petitioners' FOIL request, the Appellate Division observed that Petitioners had also sought FDNY "... records[] pertaining to cases initiated by the Bureau of Investigations and Trials ('BIT[S]')" . . . , including . . . details of all BIT[S] cases initiated against members of the FDNY, with a breakdown of each case identified by: [c]ase number; [b]ureau . . . ; [i]nfractions charged; [r]ace of charged party;… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
The payment of the appeal fee was effected with the date of 17 March 2015.V. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
App. 2002), reh'g denied, trans. denied 783 N.E.2d 701 (Ind. 2002), cert. denied 538 U.S. 1013 (2003), abrogated on other grounds by Fajardo v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
V. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
Second, Roberts argues that, because this Court has refused to read the statutory phrase “person entitled to compensation” in §933(g) to mean “person awarded compensation,” Estate of Cowart v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
Vaccine mandates also fall squarely within a State’s police power, see Zucht v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 10:29 pm
Here is the statute section for California Health and Safety Code 11379(a) in its entirety, which are commonly referred to a drug transportation charges; (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b) and in Article 7 (commencing with Section 4211) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, every person who transports, imports into this state, sells, furnishes, administers, or gives away, or offers to transport, import into this state,… [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
Defendant may use demonstrative and documentary evidence, which the State may inspect and copy or photograph after paying reasonable expenses therefor: a) photographs c) video e) maps g) pharmacy records h) films d) diagrams f) medical/hospital h) weather records10. [read post]
