Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]

Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog - http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog

Remembering the Boldt Decision

12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff

The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]

Washington State Law Library - https://medium.com/walawlibrary

Guest Post: Flipping the Script on the New Excess Health Plan Fee Case Against Johnson & Johnson

12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix

The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]

The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/

Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy

11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator

Côté J., for her part, would have allowed the appeal in part to substitute an attempted fraud conviction for the fraud conviction, substantially for the reasons of Cotnam J.A., and would have remitted the matter to the trial court for sentencing. [read post]

Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca/

[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"

8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh

If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3

7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman

And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize

7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman

C. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize

7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman

C. [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Eastern Federal District Court Gives Lessons in Alternative Service of Process in Federal Court

4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm

Co. v. [read post]

Tort Talk - http://www.torttalk.com/

[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern

4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman

Fund v. [read post]

The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/

A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”

3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]

Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/

Tornetta v. Musk: Post-Trial Opinion

1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]

The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/

Tornetta v. Musk: Post-Trial Opinion

1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD J. [read post]

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu

SEC Commissioner Dissents from Denial of Petition to Change No-Admit, No-Deny Policy

30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding

In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the… [read post]

The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/

New Issue: American Journal of International Law

29 Jan 2024, 8:37 am by Jacob Katz Cogan

United States) Cóman Kenny, Prosecutor v. [read post]

International Law Reporter - https://ilreports.blogspot.com/