Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 141 - 160
of 13,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 7:55 am
R. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:09 pm
c. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In our view, the trial judge’s reasons are sufficient in law (see R. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:00 pm
In the case of Healey v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
” President Joseph R. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Oct. 18, 2023 Nealon, J.), Judge Terrance R. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
The judge held that the defence of statutory acquiescence raised by the Defendants under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994), could not succeed because the five year period only starts to run when the earlier trade mark owner has knowledge of both the use of the later trade mark, and of its registration (applying Case C-482/09, Budejovický Budvar np v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2011] ECR I-08701). [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
” (the Decision).c. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Also consider that on Monday, December 11, 2023, in State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:29 am
" (r. 3.4.3). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
These numerous decisions are thoroughly researched and reviewed by Judge Terrence R. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
C. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
This judgment addressed the question whether artificial neural networks (ANNs) are excluded subject matter under the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion of section 1(2)(c) of the UK Patents Act 1977. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Air Force C-17 to Egypt [were] subsequently transported via ground into Gaza and then distributed by U.N. agencies. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Seth C. [read post]
