Search for: "State v. Cheek"
Results 141 - 160
of 383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2017, 9:23 am
Together with Cheeks v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 5:08 pm
The oral swab sought here represents a minimally intrusive mean of obtaining a DNA sample by simply using a cotton swab in Defendant's cheek lining. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Wildlands v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
Caballes (2005) and United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
Furthermore, as discussed in Part IV, at least two state courts differ in their treatment of this issue, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ invalidation of a statute analogous to North Carolina’s is instructive on the Fourth Amendment unreasonableness of cheek swabs under such statutes. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:27 am
This is one of those (rare) case, all the more remarkable because the inmate won his appeal pro se against the Connecticut Attorney General's office.The case is Gaffney v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:54 am
So the officers appealed, but the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to resolve the appeal on technical grounds.The case is Bryant v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
1United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
" Section 23-9.2(a) states as follows: "(a) Maintenance. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In the new, post-Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
” State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
” (Healy v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:52 pm
In TXOGA and TIPRO v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
” See United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:53 am
Cheek v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
Amobi v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
