Search for: "State v. Coca"
Results 141 - 160
of 491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
This said, a collection of multiple NFTs is actually a collection of multiple, non-fungible, products similar in kind to a physical product produced and sold in a series although within a limited edition.As a sidenote, it is also worth noting that the forthcoming EU Market in Crypto Assets Regulation (MICA) states that “the issuance of crypto-assets as non-fungible tokens in a large series or collection should be considered as an indicator of their fungibility” (Recital 6c, last… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:12 pm
McCambridge v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:08 am
Coca-Cola Co.); increasing ongoing debate about whether photo-shopped advertising should be banned or regulated in the United States; and then this morning what I thought was a very interesting comment on a potential lawsuit by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (“CSPI”) against Campbell Soup Company for alleged false marketing claims for its V8 Splash and V8 V-Fusion Refresher drinks (see: here). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The functionality of hashtags was introduced by Twitter but has since been extended to other social media platforms, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest (to name a few), and the to blogosphere as a whole.Against this backdrop, it is instructive to consider two recent trade mark applications filed in the United States by the Coca Cola Company for 'soft drinks' in class 32, #cokecanpics TM no. 86480497 and #smilewithacoke TM no. 86480495. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
Coca-Cola resists this canon and its high standard. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Importantly, the Coca-Cola action followed on the heels of another class action, Costanza v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:53 am
Inc v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
The case is BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:15 am
The Coca-Cola Co., No. 3:08-CV-367, 2010 WL 2342458 (W.D.N.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Following the rule in Benson v Coca Cola Co., 120 N.J. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 5:00 pm
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:56 pm
Coca Cola Co., 318 F.3d 1284, 1290–91 (11th Cir. 2003). [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The case of BCI Coca-Cola Co. of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
