Search for: "State v. Corrigan" Results 141 - 160 of 230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 3:00 pm by Madelaine Lane
Justice Corrigan concurred with the majority but wrote separately to state that she believes MCL 600.1645 requires any venue challenges in criminal cases to be resolved through interlocutory appeal. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
These four Michigan Supreme Court justices - Justice Young (up for election this November), along with Justice Corrigan, Markman and Taylor - essentially created an entirely new auto law in this state with Kreiner. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by Julie Lam
Justice Weaver, joined by Justice Hathaway, issued a separate dissenting opinion agreeing with Justice Young’s criticism that the new rule will have unforseen consequences, and stating that “the majority’s unrestrained decision today is a huge mistake. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
  Justice Markman, joined by Justices Corrigan, Hathaway, and Young, delivered the opinion of the Court, overturning its 1982-decision in Silva v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by Aaron Lindstrom
Slaughter, No. 141009, the Court granted the State’s application. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
On July 14, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Chief Justice Kelly’s majority opinion in Adair v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm by Julie Lam
On July 13, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in Beattie v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:04 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
Justice Corrigan concurred, but she would have overruled Home Builders. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:35 pm by Daithí
 Curiously, it also drew quite a lot of good laughs, with Ray Corrigan giving it a joint comedy award. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:53 am by John Bursch
  So held the Michigan Supreme Court in Pellegrino v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:38 am by Madelaine Lane
  The state is seeking review of the April 12, 2010 Court of Appeals order denying the state leave to appeal. [read post]
8 May 2010, 9:15 am by Matthew Nelson
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Tus v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]