Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
Furthermore, R v Bender stated that an honest mistake on the time and date of the required attendance of the accused can negate the mens rea of the offence. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am
Furthermore, the Crown only needs to provide circumstantial evidence of ownership (see: R v Bagshaw, 1971CanLII 13 (SCC), [1972] SCR 2). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:41 am
Additionally, as indicated in R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:45 am
—Bill Lee 1Transpac Marine, LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:19 am
The clear intention of Parliament in enacting these Acts was to permit the Crown to make the Protocol. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
Albert’s Diamond Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 12:25 pm
On January 12, 2023, Justice Ingrid Joseph, New York State Supreme Court, Kings County, dismissed a petition seeking to halt a residential development in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:11 pm
When SOIRA was initially passed, it contained two important safeguards for offenders: A sex offender would only be placed on the registry if the Crown prosecutor first chose to apply to the court for an order requiring the offender to comply with SOIRA. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:58 pm
R v SG stated that an invitation occurs when the accused asks for permission to touch the victim or if the accused asks the victim to touch the accused. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:48 pm
Criminal intimidation, under s.423(1), is a hybrid offence, where depending on the circumstances of your case, the Crown can elect to proceed either summarily or by indictment. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:27 pm
This means that the Crown must prove that it was you who committed the offence. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
But that provides a weapon to the great enemy of the Cuban state--the Americans. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
David Torrance, House of Commons Library: The Crown and the constitution. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
On Dec. 13, 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court published a 51-page judgment in Kohelet Forum v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:38 am
Lawful excuse As explicitly stated in section 127 itself, there is no offence where the accused has a lawful excuse to disobey the court order. [read post]
