Search for: "State v. D. U." Results 141 - 160 of 2,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2015, 1:39 pm by HRWatchdog
Supreme Court acknowledged that states have the authority to interpret contracts according to state law, even though it expressed “doubt that the Court of Appeal ha[d] correctly interpreted California law” in this case. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 2019 NY Slip Op 33476(U) November 27, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153468/2019 Judge: Robert D. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
But Duenas-Alvarez requires that there be 'a realistic probability, not a theoretical possibility, that the State would apply its statute to conduct that falls outsidethe generic definition of a crime.' 549 U. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:33 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
The sentence was reversed on appeal pre-Kimbrough, then GVR’d by the Supreme Court post-Kimbrough. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:17 pm
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several  Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries:   (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass Production and… [read post]