Search for: "State v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DIST."
Results 141 - 160
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
As a federal district court charged with applying Texas law under the Erie doctrine, the Southern District of Texas was bound to follow: (1) decisions of the Texas Supreme Court, and (2) predictions of Texas law made by the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Fifth Court of Appeals affirms waiver ruling. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
Klamath Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Should the Second Circuit Reverse the District Court’s Judgment in Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
But because the evidence thus far suggests that Sotomayor will often come out the same way as Souter did, I think we can draw important conclusions from the close cases in which Justice Stevens provided a fifth vote for the majority. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
-Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:57 am
She served as a federal district court judge in the Southern District of New York from 1992 to 1998. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:00 pm
Dist. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
The district court rejected his arguments, and so do we. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
The district court rejected his arguments, and so do we. [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:59 am
Dist. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Dist. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
(In fact, Kern County had made a prior attempt in 1999 to pass a similar ordinance, which was held by the California Fifth Appellate District Court of Appeal in County Sanitation District 2 v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:48 pm
In light of this, the court stated that “[t]he question before us now is whether 42 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no writ); Jordan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:04 am
Dist. v. [read post]
