Search for: "State v. Daves"
Results 141 - 160
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Coca-Cola only surveyed in 10 of the 27 Member States, which the court held to be less than a ‘significant proportion’ of the relevant public for the Mark. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:10 am
In Sangervasi v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:07 pm
What: Oral Arguments in Under Seal v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:29 pm
In Spirito v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:43 am
Well Workcompcentral has reported that Patton Boggs is petitioning for cert in Hadden v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm
In light of the US Supreme Court’s decision this week not to grant review in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
Guests: Brian Schweitzer: State of Montana, @brianschweitzer Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine, @rickhasen Dave Levinthal: Politico, @davelevinthal Eugene Volokh: University of California, Los Angeles, @VolokhC Links: Schweitzer on ‘mining for influence in Montana’ (NY Times) Buckley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
In acknowledgment of our readers' Second Amendment rights, and until such time as District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
He stated that this evidence clearly identified 138 persons who had been removed from the Gift Lake Membership List by the Registrar of the Metis Settlements Land Registry. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:44 am
Because he has not proved a reasonable probability of suppression, Gonzalez fails to state a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel.Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 3:31 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 8:48 am
By Greg Daugherty, Dave Tumen and Rich Helmreich Unintended consequences are a fact of life. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
Gallos, 47 N.J. 295, 303 (1966) (a New Jersey investor purchased stock through a New Jersey office of a broker, knowing the transaction would be executed in New York; New York had a valid basis for asserting jurisdiction over the customer); Dave’s Trash Removal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:16 am
In Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:47 am
Supreme Court’s 2020 landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
First off, let's deal with a bit of news from the ongoing trench warfare between the entity formerly known as the Scruggs Katrina Group and State Farm known as McIntosh v. [read post]
