Search for: "State v. David K. Marks" Results 141 - 160 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
”The question asked by the court in Currier was simple: “Is the 15-week mark before or after viability? [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
She provided Smith's date of birth to the receptionist who answered her call, and gave his social security number to David Wright, Esquire ("Wright"), the Moss attorney with whom she spoke. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less, undercutting the designated United… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Haynes and Boone, LLP Partners Dan Gold, Kit Addleman, Thad Behrens, Emily Westridge Black, Carrie Huff, Tim Newman, David Siegal, and Odean Volker take a look at the important securities litigation developments during 2017. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Banc de Binary Ltd, Oren Shabat Laurent (f/k/a Oren Shabat), Et Binary Options Ltd., Bo Systes Ltd., Seychelles and BDB Services Ltd. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
Even more fascinating, for those who browse the UK Intellectual Property Office website in search of excitement and possible decisions for inclusion in the European Trade Mark Reports, is a decision of David Landau, for the Comptroller, in Case O-307/11 which shows that, quite undaunted by his lack of success against Dame Viv, the same Mr K is up to not inconsiderable mischief again. [read post]