Search for: "State v. Eisenberg"
Results 141 - 160
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The first case, Holder v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(See Eisenberg, et al., Cal. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
In Wong v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Nicholas Eisenberger & David Gottesman, Harvard Business Publishing, December 7, 2009 There are plenty of reasons to be disappointed with the Copenhagen climate talks that start today: the meeting will not result in a binding agreement, the timeframe for such an agreement is potentially years away, and of course, neither the US nor China has committed to binding reductions. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:57 pm
The D.C. case, Horn v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Check the Beard v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:02 pm
Reaction to a recent post on the Wall Street Journal Law Blog (here) makes it clear that my colleague Ted Eisenberg's (Cornell) data-driven critique (forthcoming in JELS) of the US Chamber of Commerce's annual state "rankings" of perceived "lawsuit climate" struck something of a raw nerve. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:30 pm
Judge Eisenberg dismissed the trustee's suit, stating: . [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Eisenberg tried to get U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:01 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:46 pm
" Delgozzo, supra, 266 Super. at 187; see also Eisenberg, supra, 766 F. 2d at 786 (explaining that typicality is present where the factual circumstances of the class representatives are not "markedly different" from other members of the class); Weiss v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
Ellenhorn of counsel), for state respondent. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
Wald also omitted that Eisenberger is actually a physicist by training and experience. [read post]
11 May 2009, 5:44 pm
Professors Theodore Eisenberg, Michael Heise, and Martin T. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:51 am
Baker by Theodore Eisenberg, Michael Heise, and Martin T. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:21 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Mohamed v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
