Search for: "State v. Figueroa"
Results 141 - 160
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2009, 3:03 am
United States in my pocket. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 8:16 am
District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:11 am
In Figueroa, Iacobucci J., speaking for himself and five other judges, states, “the best interpretation of s. 3 is one that advances the values and principles that embody a free and democratic state, including respect for a diversity of beliefs and opinions” (Figueroa, Iacobucci J., para. 27). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
In Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Such agreements are enforceable under the ADEA since the Act does not preclude arbitration of claims brought pursuant to the statute (April 1, 2009).Flores-Figueroa v United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:57 pm
One such case was in a California Supreme Court case known as Ingersoll v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:21 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:24 am
Supreme Court case in 2009, Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:01 am
” Figueroa v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
Yesterday in People v Figueroa, 2008 NY Slip Op 01604, the First Department was confronted with whether the trial court violated the procedure in CPL § 310.30 after receiving a somewhat unusual note from the jury foreperson. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm
The court accordingly remanded for a de novo sentencing.United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:15 pm
The purpose of the lawsuit, entitled Figueroa v Burwell (PDF), is stated to be “to require HHS to provide blind individuals meaningful and equally effective access to their Medicare information, as required by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:39 am
Figueroa-Florez, 64 F.4th 223 (2d Cir. 2022); United States v. [read post]
