Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 8,983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
” The post Rucho v Common Cause: Supreme Court Rules Courts Can’t Solve Partisan Gerrymandering appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:24 pm
CLS Transportation case, the California Court of Appeal’s First Appellate District has affirmed a trial court’s holding that an arbitration clause categorically proscribing class and representative actions is unconscionable. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Auxer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:12 pm
In 36th District Court v Michigan American Federation of Sate, County and Municipal Employees, the Court of Appeals decided several issues arising out of arbitration between the 36th District Court and AFSCME over the chief judge’s decision not to re-appoint four judicial officers. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:04 pm
(California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
The result of the district court’s injunction is thus not to resolve a political dispute through judicial fiat, but rather to throw that dispute back into the political and administrative fora where it belongs. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Portnoff v Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, 2017 WL 708745 (E.D. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:26 pm
Mehta of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia resolved the DOJ's motion in two steps. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Carter v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court held in Monaco v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
The district court granted that motion. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:58 am
" The district court observed that in Rein v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:27 am
– Judge Bonnie Sudderth, 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 2:28 am
First, it had asked whether EAWs were defective for the purposes of the Extradition Act 2003, s 2(6)(c) if they failed to give particulars of the domestic warrants issued in the category 1 to enforce that judgment or order within the issuing state. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:48 am
In a decision and order dated December 23, 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected the Mother's contentions and ordered that the children be returned to Poland. [read post]
