Search for: "State v. Flowers&nbsp " Results 141 - 160 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Chief Justice Hughes in the 1932 case Crowell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
  As the nation enters 2022, 21 states and the District of Columbia have significant tax changes taking effect. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
 Nonetheless, an NBC News report observed, after Flowers that the Supreme Court “was hailed for sending a message to lower courts to be vigilant about racial bias in the criminal justice system. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
  That is the principal objective of my contribution: ‘The Flower of Democracy Blooms Brilliantly in China’ [中国的民主之花绚丽绽放]: The Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Constitutional Order . [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” Coverage of the remand in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
 ;              EXEMPTIONS Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State of California (March 26, 2014, C070836) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:28 pm
A couple of weeks ago, when the world was busy celebrating Valentine's Day [Merpel remembers it quite well as that day she got far too many flowers and ate far too many heart-shaped chocolates], the Court of Appeal of England and Wales was busy deciding a case of libel, this being Payam Tamiz v Google. [read post]