Search for: "State v. GC"
Results 141 - 160
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
By Eric Goldman Rothamel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
In the meantime, we know lots of ethical, forward-thinking, ultra-competent lawyers who provide value for GCs the "old way". [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
In 3 cases, the applicants were not properly represented by a lawyer before the GC: T‑128/21 (Finnish legal counsel), T-716/20 (lawyer was CEO of the applicant), and T‑424/21 (Daimler v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 3:02 pm
In Durham (Regional Municipality) v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:00 pm
This case (Matia Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 12:39 pm
It also cited a Supreme Court decision, NLRB v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:48 pm
So holds the Utah Supreme Court in last week’s Herland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
A former general counsel of a diagnostic lab, who participated in a qui tam action, violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, ruled the Second Circuit (United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, October 25, 2013, Cabranes, J). [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
That exercise is primarily a function of national courts, in respect of which states enjoy a margin of appreciation, subject to the supervision of the Strasbourg Court [96] – [97]. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:31 am
State legislators need to spend more on the judiciary. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
The Portugese Court had not been able to put the interests of the property owners and the tenant in the balance, the absolute terms of the law after the 20 year period were not per se incompatible with the Convention (Evans v UK [GC] App No 6339/05 at para 89, Salabaiku v France App No 10519/83 at para 28). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
The Portugese Court had not been able to put the interests of the property owners and the tenant in the balance, the absolute terms of the law after the 20 year period were not per se incompatible with the Convention (Evans v UK [GC] App No 6339/05 at para 89, Salabaiku v France App No 10519/83 at para 28). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:48 pm
Today’s case is Mota Construction Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:32 pm
Germany (No. 2) [GC], §§ 109-113 and Axel Springer AG v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Judgment Having stated the general principles regarding the competing interests between Articles 8 and 10 ECHR, the Court set out the relevant aspects of freedom of expression where the liability of an online publisher for publication anonymous comments is in question, as articulated in Delfi AS v Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 137, ECHR 2015. [read post]
