Search for: "State v. Garnett"
Results 141 - 160
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 3:22 am
Disciplinary probationFeliciano v Safir, Supreme Court, [Not officially reported]Garnett v Safir, 253 A.D.2d 700, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 92 N.Y.2d 817The Feliciano Case:Although the specific events underlying the Feliciano case are but rarely encountered, the decision demonstrates that an employee’s “disciplinary probation status” may follow the individual to a new agency upon his or her transfer if the new employer wishes to condition the… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
New Injury (0) Would Kevin Garnett’s knee injury be considered a workers’ compensation claim? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, eds., Foundation Press, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
"I wonder if a big part of it is luck," Garnett said. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
" It will appear in a new book in the Law Stories series, First Amendment Stories, edited by Andy Koppelman and our own Rick Garnett. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
In so doing, the state apparently realized the futility of claiming that its expansive buffer zone law was supported by Hill v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Code § 3548; Garnette v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:30 am
Garnett, 265 Va. 12, 15 (2003). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele explained why in FSLIC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele explained why in FSLIC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele explained why in FSLIC v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
Geoff is not his usual careful self in his reply to Rick Garnett and me, and the straw men he flails away at bear little resemblance to what I said. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
04/21/09 Mirror of Justice Blog:"Here are a couple of letters to the speaker of the Connecticut house arguing for meaningful religious liberty exemptions in the bill [to implement the state supreme court's October 2008 decision in Kerrigan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
" He likens it (if I understand his argument) to Justice Harlan's tradition-based methodology of due process in Poe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held that the regulation was a tax, and not subject to takings analysis.The Mountain States Legal Foundation's brief argues the Court should review the case to resolve the confusion created by Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
E.g., Tronfeld v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:43 am
Pham, Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter DefenseHenri C. [read post]
