Search for: "State v. Gee" Results 141 - 160 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Gee, a pending cert petition challenging a Louisiana law that would require abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals,] … could be first in a series of incremental rulings on a path that, in the end, would determine the fate [of] Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania and in Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:19 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
However, WCAB panel decisions are not binding precedent, as are en banc decisions, on all other Appeals Board panels and workers’ compensation judges [see Gee v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
Gee Hesa Shithead or, to bring this back to go, People of New York v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 2:52 am
More than twenty years ago, in Griffey v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am by Anna Christensen
Estate of Terry Gee, Jr. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:57 am by Lawrence Taylor
" (663 P.2d 992, 1001, conc. opn.Feldman, J.; see also State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
Holmes probably believed what he wrote in Abrams, just as he believed what her wrote in Schenck v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:27 pm by Mike
In the second step, usually after the close of discovery, the defendant may move for decertification.In the two cases today Gee  focuses on step one and Temple v. [read post]