Search for: "State v. Giles"
Results 141 - 160
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
This is thanks to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:45 am
Earlier this month I testified in Gusciora v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
But there’s serious question, especially in light of dicta in Giles v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:04 pm
But Giles v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Giles v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:12 pm
The name of the game is no longer the claim Judge Giles Rich (about whom more later) famously stated that “the name of the game is the claim. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:26 am
As explained by the Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
" Giles v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Giles, 83 N.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Giles v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:59 am
Giles of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Judge Jane R. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
