Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 141 - 160 of 5,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 8:02 am
Justice Scalia's opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
Schweppes subsequently took Red Paralela to court for trademark infringement.The CJEU was asked four questions, which it dealt with together, asking in essence "…whether Article 7(1) of Directive 2008/95, read in the light of Article 36 TFEU, must be interpreted as precluding the proprietor of a national trade mark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same mark originating in another Member State in which that mark, which initially belonged… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
Although the classical tradition incorporates a subset of political morality within law, namely the subset bearing on the virtues of general justice and regnative prudence, of which [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
These and other considerations suggest that there are good reasons why states generally shouldn't regulate what their citizens do when in other states. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am by Helen Alvaré
There are at least three constitutional questions raised in Fulton that bear upon religious agencies’ cooperation with the state to serve the common good. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:56 am by Gene Quinn
On May 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]