Search for: "State v. Graber"
Results 141 - 160
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2007, 8:29 am
" See United States v Larson, __ F.3d. __, 2007 WL 2192256 (9th Cir. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:48 pm
In Dumont v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
Applying the framework from the recent en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In Green v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
The goal of nationwide uniformity driving the Sentencing Guidelines is not well-served when we apply an enhancement for all burglaries in one state but none in California, our most populous state. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 11:14 am
States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
Graber, a Clinton appointee, suggested the state high court might already have rejected the constitutional argument, albeit in a more narrow context. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Madison and Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
(Mark Graber, Sanford Levinson, Mark Tushnet, eds., Oxford University Press, 2018 Forthcoming)).Marie T. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:11 am
When excerpting Evenwel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:28 am
Wade, but also a lesser-known opinion called Chambers v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:09 pm
(You gotta love it, by the way, if you're the plaintiff and the case is so huge that a one percent dispute over prejudgment interest is worth an entire appeal.)Not only does plaintiff win the appeal, but Judge Graber has a funny paragraph that lightly jabs the defendants and made me chuckle a little:"Defendants also assert that the doctrine of judicial estoppel bars Plaintiff from seeking to apply state law on appeal because, before the district court, Plaintiff argued… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
