Search for: "State v. Griffin"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
The proposition responded to Griffin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:25 am
In Griffin v Jones, 170 F.Supp.3d 956 [W.D. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
For example, in the wake of the landmark 1954 decision in Brown v Board of Education, desegregating all public schools, the Commonwealth responded first, by refusing to comply with the decision, then taking the unusual step of closing their public schools from 1959 to 1964, until the SCOTUS righted the ship in Griffin v Prince Edward County. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:35 am
Commentary on Monday’s ruling in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 6:54 am
This morning, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:35 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Griffin, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm
Griffin is William S. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Roger Parloff at Fortune Legal Pad is out with some informative analysis based on an interview with attorney John Griffin Jones, who filed the fee suit against Scruggs. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:15 am
Eskridge Rico v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm
Griffin. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
If Section 3 requires federal enforcement legislation, then States cannot unilaterally remove Trump from the ballot.Part II provides a careful study of Griffin’s Case, a federal circuit court case decided by Chief Justice Salmon P. [read post]
