Search for: "State v. Harrington" Results 141 - 160 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm by Mary Dwyer
Winston12-492Issue: (1) Whether the Fourth Circuit created an impermissible end-run around Harrington v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.609(a)(2) provides that Evidence that any witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if it involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm by Michael O'Hear
In any event, it was interesting for me to read Martinez the same week that I taught Harrington v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Jon Ibanez
The United States Supreme Court recently unanimously held in Riley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:18 am by Shon Hopwood
” The key disagreement between the parties is whether the Court’s 1926 decision in Napier v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Congratulations to Deputy Assistant AG Sarah Harrington, who argued for the appellees. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:57 pm by John W. Arden
The court dismissed the RICO, Sherman Act, and Electronic Privacy Act claims, as well as some state law claims in March 2010. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:11 pm by Ben Cheng
JamesDocket: 12-11Issue(s): Whether the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion conflicts with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and this Court's decisions in Harrington v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:43 am
Harrington "Appellant's failure to show that he is exempt under federal law from having to pay Social Security taxes precludes his being exempt under state law and regulation from having to submit a Social Security number with an application to renew his drivers' license. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  We've previously noted Zachary Newkirk’s "Full Justice May Be Done Them": The Case of Bill, Charles, Jupiter, Randolph, et al. v. [read post]