Search for: "State v. J. Woods" Results 141 - 160 of 558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
Sachs J said: “The state should, wherever reasonably possible, seek to avoid putting believers to extremely painful and intensely burdensome choices of either being true to their faith or else respectful of the law. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Of the three principal candidates – the other two being Solicitor General Elena Kagan and Judge Diane Wood – Judge Garland would also likely have the most immediate influence on the Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
From the Feb. 2009 issue of Engage:Kimberlee Wood Colby, Monumentally Speaking: Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States, the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, and same-sex marriage. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Echoing arguments by Theda Skocpol on Civil War pensions, DPADR argues that the various forms of debt relief offered by 19th-century state legislatures constituted a sort of proto-welfare state. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am by Ronald Mann
  The circumstance was most apparent because the argument followed immediately upon United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Dyson v Channel Four Television Corporation [2022] EWHC 2718 (KB) (31 October 2022) at first instance, Nicklin J said: 18. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
In this case, Mr Malcolm pointed out that Article 8 is a very broad right (a point which has often been made in posts on this blog), and that it encompasses expansive and rather amorphous concepts such as a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” (Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 at [66]) and “personal autonomy“ (R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [21]-[22]). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:28 am
Cook County Sheriff's Dept., 95 F.3d 548 (7th Cir. 1996) and Woods v. [read post]