Search for: "State v. K. A. L."
Results 141 - 160
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2019, 1:14 pm
Anders als die kommerzielle Ausnahme zur Vollstreckungsimmunität lässt sich eine Ausnahme für die Aufarbeitung schwerer Völkerrechtsbrüche nicht auf eine gewachsene Staatenpraxis stützen, sondern wird in der Literatur mit dogmatischen Argumenten begründet. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
See Nat’l League of Cities v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
(k) The tax brackets reported are for single individual. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:24 pm
Microsoft Corp., reversing, vacating, and remanding a decision by Judge Manuel L. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Collins, Ward K. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:33 pm
Gilbert, Karla L. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:46 pm
Here are some notable blog posts from my professional reading: From the K&L Gates Electronic Discovery blog, there is a discussion of a D.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm
Bureau of Reclamation (Endangered Species Act; Cultural Resources)Sxʷnq̓ʔels l Suw̓ečm / Ksukⱡiⱡmumaⱡ ʾA·kጦaⱡmukwaʾits d/b/a Energy Keepers Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:03 am
Today was the day that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave judgment in Case C‑351/12, OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s., a reference for a preliminary issue from a Czech court, the Krajský soud v Plzni. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:08 am
Stevens represented the petitioner in Atherton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
Affirmed.Case Name: JOSEPH DAX v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In that case, V.L. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 12:33 pm
New Article: Charles K. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 pm
In the State of Utah v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
K. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
After taking into account the applicable rounding rules, the amounts for 2016 are as follows:The limitation under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals described in Section 402(g)(3) remains unchanged at $18,000.The annual compensation limit under Sections 401(a)(17), 404(l), 408(k)(3)(C), and 408(k)(6)(D)(ii) remains unchanged at $265,000.The dollar limitation under Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i) concerning the definition of key employee in a… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
L. [read post]