Search for: "State v. Kaplan" Results 141 - 160 of 761
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm by Nate Nead
Meanwhile, the healthcare industry dominated Q2 2020 M&A (which is understandable given the state of the world) with 30% of deal volume — more than double the concentration in 2019 — while most others remained within a few percentage points of their five-year average [10]. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm by Nate Nead
Meanwhile, the healthcare industry dominated Q2 2020 M&A (which is understandable given the state of the world) with 30% of deal volume — more than double the concentration in 2019 — while most others remained within a few percentage points of their five-year average [10]. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Kaplan is a Director at Saxena White P.A. and co-head of the firm’s Direct Action practice. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm by CAFE
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm by CAFE
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:55 pm by CAFE
  Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial Producer REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:  VOTE for Stay Tuned with Preet at the Webby Awards The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
And, there is no prejudice to the state in this case as a result of plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's rules, as the delay did not increase the likelihood that evidence favorable to the state in this case would have been lost because of the delay. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
For example, judges used to consider implicit (or unwritten) reasons in a decision, and this no longer will be sufficient after the Supreme Court’s decision in Vavilov (see for example, Farrier v. [read post]