Search for: "State v. Kirk R."
Results 141 - 160
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 11:16 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
And there is something Kirk-like about the Raelian “prophet,” Claude Vorilhon. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
The principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law is common to all the legal orders of the Member States of the EU: the Kent Kirk case (C-63/83 [1984] ECR 2689 established that national measures imposing criminal sanctions with retroactive effect are incompatible with Community law. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
Drug dependency not a disability under New York’s Human Rights LawMatter of Michael Kirk v City of New York, 47 AD3d 406Michael Kirk was terminated from his position with the New York City Fire Department after testing positive for cocaine in a random drug test.The Appellate Division rejected Kirk’s contention that the Department’s random drug testing policy is unconstitutional and decided that the penalty of termination for substance abuse… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:04 pm
By a 6-1 vote, the California State Supreme Court just declined to review the Court of Appeal decision in Kirk v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Most of the important enterprises in China are state-owned. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Most of the important enterprises in China are state-owned. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm
R. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:47 am
Application of State v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:50 am
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm
Gary R. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:11 am
Attempting to vacate a consent agreement resolving an administrative proceedingMatter of Kirk v State Bd. for Professional Med. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:56 pm
Johnson and Johnson, No. 07-3690 Richard Kirkes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm
In his rather transparent effort to shift into a populist campaign mode, President Barack Obama today devoted his Saturday radio address to slamming the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
Kirk, [1968] 2 O.R. 213 (ON C.A.). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am
The Court's decision, in the case of Curious Theater Company v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District Court S D Florida denies… [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:50 am
State; May v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm
Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced that members of the U.S. [read post]
