Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 141 - 160
of 6,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2007, 2:46 pm
By K&L Gates Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am
Guido v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
26 May 2018, 2:01 pm
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
B. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:49 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
It was the Magnitone that preoccupied three days of Patents Court time before Mr Justice Carr this past December and which was subject to the recent decision of L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173. [read post]
1 May 2008, 4:05 pm
MARK L MCLAURIN; TAWANA MCLAURIN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:49 pm
L. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
13 May 2012, 3:58 pm
L. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
(People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
See Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:06 pm
CLS Bank Int’l., although the court did state that the defendant’s motion could be renewed after claim construction and discovery. [read post]