Search for: "State v. Leach" Results 141 - 160 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
The court would like to reiterate that the undue influence concept speaks to the testator's state of mind at the time of the execution of the will. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:11 pm by Jessica Mendelson
Texas State Representative Jeff Leach, a Republican, recently introduced a bill in the state’s House of Representatives regarding the use of social media for service of process. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am by Sheppard Mullin
Case examples include an employee who used customer credit card information to go on elaborate spending sprees (United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Case examples include an employee who used customer credit card information to go on elaborate spending sprees (United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am by Rich Vetstein
If you are selling your home, you cannot close without a passing Title V inspection of your septic system, completed by an inspector who is licensed by the state and your town. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cruikshank, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1519 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Activa DPS Europe SARL v Pressure Seal Solutions Ltd (t/a Welltec Systems UK) [2012] EWCA Civ 943 (11 July 2012) Leach v The Office of Communications (OFCOM) [2012] EWCA Civ 959 (13 July 2012) SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 940 (13 July 2012) Berent v Family Mosaic Housing… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:09 pm by Shelton Abramson
”  S.3333 would not apply to financial institutions that are covered under Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or covered entities that are subject to breach notification requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).The bill contains two basic requirements. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
” “Covered entities” as defined in the Toomey Bill do not include financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or HIPAA-covered entities, which are exempt from the bill’s requirements. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:06 am by Kate Fort
’s (“Barrick”) Cortez Hills Project (“Project”), a large open pit, cyanide-leach gold mine on Mt. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Wessen Jazrawi
For instance, while the political implications of e.g., the M v Germany judgment were recognised in Germany, there was never any question that it would not be implemented. [read post]