Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 141 - 160 of 28,745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But the decisions in those cases were for the most part short-lived or limited in impact. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
The success of restitution procedures created during[6] and immediately[7] after World War II was short-lived. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
” There will not be any easy answers: “The distinction between private conduct and state action turns on substance, not labels: Private parties can act with the authority of the State, and state officials have private lives and their own constitutional rights. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
A landlord can refuse to rent the felon a place to live and employers can refuse to hire the person. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]