Search for: "State v. Madrid" Results 141 - 160 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 11:52 am by Karen Hoffmann
Her first post will discuss the S.A.S. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 2:35 am
In these cases, the Court stated, the claimant have to ground their standing to sue for all and any content over which they claim infringement. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Likewise there is an almost obsessive interest in patent litigation in the United States, where the subject lies somewhere between a cottage industry and an art form, with ever-shifting guidance concerning injunctions, damages, patent eligibility and the interrelationship of patent suits with the sale price of patents singly or in bundles. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:42 pm by Jon Gelman
(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; Editing by Crispian Balmer)[Click here to see the rest of this post]Found onRelated articlesChemical at Goodyear Plant Linked to Bladder Cancer in 50 Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Medical Device Litigation: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
  This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
 The Madrid Agreement was all in French and ignored. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Confusing clues of activityThis decision of the Paris Court of Appeal comes a few weeks after another national ruling on ISP liability by the Court of Appeal of Madrid [the Telecinco case, on which see this Kat’s note here]. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
  The 2006 E.U. law of, drafted in the wake of terrorist attacks in London and Madrid, orders phone and Internet providers to store details of connections on their network in case needed for law enforcement authorities. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Finally, on IP Tango, Patricia Covarrubia marks the first birthday of Mexico's membership of the Madrid Protocol on international trade mark registration. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:06 pm by Miquel Peguera
The Madrid court deemed that YouTube satisfies this standard of neutrality, relying on the more elaborated criteria provided by the CJEU in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:30 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Celine Camara, Doctoral candidate, Researcher at the Max-Planck Institute, Discrimination against Third State Nationals in Regulation 2201/2003 “Brussels II bis”. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
As to the combination between colour and shapes, the Court mentioned another similar case decided by the EU General Court with reference to the green square illustrated on the right (decision in Case T‑282/09, Fédération internationale des logis v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:26 pm by Marta Requejo
The judgment of the Commercial Court of Madrid can of course be appealed – and it is highly likely this has been the case. [read post]