Search for: "State v. Magnuson"
Results 141 - 160
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
District Court Dismisses Warranty Claims Based on Defects That Manifest Outside the Limited Warranty
6 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
See Alban v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
William Magnuson. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 6:59 pm
Northern District of California Judge Jeffrey White certified a nationwide class in a consumer product case this week in Wolph v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
At issue is an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying summary judgment on all claims by Appellants, who are former general category scallop permit holders, while granting summary judgment on all claims to Appellees Gary Locke, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
In Farina v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
After Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:41 am
Netland (2009), Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe, and State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:52 am
Cooper v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
Magnuson, Justice Lorie Skjerven Gildea, and Justice Christopher J. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
At length, the Court (Magnuson, C.J.) asks, "Does this question (whether the allegedly protected conduct falls outside the protection of the statute) have to go to trial? [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:32 am
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument this afternoon in Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Finally, the court held that because there was no implied warranty claim under state law, there could be no Magnuson Moss claim under federal law. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Lewis v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 5:48 am
NFL Players Association v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:48 am
Every Penny Counts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
Semitekol v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:50 am
Read the whole case, Jones v. [read post]
