Search for: "State v. Mai X." Results 141 - 160 of 3,540
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook opinion (the court praises that dissent as “influential”–though surely not more influential in California state courts than Barrett v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Court decision last year in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
In May 2022, a divided Supreme Court put the Texas law on hold while the challenges to the law continued in the lower courts. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Greg Abbott defended the use of the wire fencing, writing on X (then known as Twitter) that “Texas has the sovereign authority to defend our borders” and insisting that the state would “continue to deploy every strategy to protect Texans and Americans — and the migrants risking their lives. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Thalia Kruger
However, Article 25.2.c prescribed that the State’s responsibility did not end when a judgment had been reached and that public authorities may not obstruct the meaning nor the scope of judicial decisions or unduly delay their enforcement (Mejía Idrovo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
App’x 586 (2d Cir. 2019) (“An ICS may not be held liable for so-called ‘neutral assistance’ or tools and functionality that are available equally to bad actors and the app’s intended users…To the extent Grindr contributes to the impersonating profiles, it is through such ‘neutral assistance. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
The State Law Libraries Outreach Initiative to strengthen the ties between the Law Library of Congress and state law libraries continues. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Imprint: Irwin Law Publication Date: October 18, 2023 ISBN: Print (Paperback): 9781552217146 ISBN: Digital (PDF): 9781552217153 Page count: 240 pages; 6″ x 9″ Excerpt: Chapter 1. [read post]