Search for: "State v. Mak"
Results 141 - 160
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
See, Creative Hospitality v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:31 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Austin & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 345 (24 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Seeff & Anor v Dinh Nam Ho & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 186 (24 February 2011) Sita UK Ltd. v Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority [2011] EWCA Civ 156 (24 February 2011) British Airways Plc v Mak & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 184 (24 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Phethean- Hubble v… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:18 pm
Arzate v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm
(John Elwood) Lawrence Hurley at Greenwire (now up on the NY Times website) is reporting that the Justice Department asked that Professor Larry Tribe’s name be stricken from the brief he filed in American Electric Power v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:29 am
AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:01 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:08 pm
Perez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 1:24 pm
In a footnote, the court stated that they were “mak[ing] no negative inference” on his exercise of his Fifth Amendment right. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm
“Traditionally, securities market regulation and law enforcement relied upon a ‘three legged stool’ of the SEC, federal and state attorneys general and investor actions. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
The paediatrician wrote a letter stating that as there was insufficient evidence to consider that the girl had been abused, her father should no longer be considered to be implicated in the sexual abuse of his daughter. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 8:28 pm
In Mak v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969) and Washington v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:10 pm
Could be a lot worse.But you're facing, inter alia, a federal charge of illegally possessing firearms, including a MAK-90. [read post]
