Search for: "State v. Makee R."
Results 141 - 160
of 34,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
In the case Fisher v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 2:32 pm
North Dakota [SCOTUSblog materials], consolidated with Bernard, William R. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
For the respondent: Mary R. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 41, 24 June 2015 (see judgment). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
But, these cases rest on the proposition that the fiscal intermediaries are essentially state instrumentalities, as the governing regulations make clear. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Mark R. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society… [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:34 pm
In doing so, the court followed its equally problematic September 2006 decision inMandy R. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 2:24 pm
So it seems that was a tactical call by the OSU team, otherwise known as the Attorney General of the State of Ohio: Let's make the strong case for direct infringement instead of pleading a kitchen-sink complaint The post Ohio State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am
On 2 December 2019, the Supreme Court heard the case of R v Hilton following certification by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
Hexum v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
Leister, V. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:27 am
It decided that the make-up for the October 8 examination would be the next scheduled general test for promotion to Lieutenant which, as petitioners point out, will likely not be conducted until at least the year 2001,Justice Franklin R. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Wabash R. [read post]
