Search for: "State v. Nicole M."
Results 141 - 160
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:51 pm
And to his order last week in State of Florida v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P., New York (Nicole A. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
In Fox v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
On 14 June 2019 Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2019] EWHC 1529 (QB). [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
Between 1899 and 1911, it held that a trade tax on the Chicago Board of Trade (Nicol v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
On 12 February 2020 Nicol J heard the trial in the case of Hathi v News Corporation. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
David M. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
On 20 and 21 October 2016 there was an application in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers before Nicol J. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
State, 103 So.3d 184 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), rev. denied, State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 2:20 pm
Davis that will send the Dominion v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
At Tuesday’s oral arguments in Mach Mining, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 7:06 am
The problem, as readers of this space know, is that the Supreme Court had issued a very confusing opinion in Philip Morris; As it happens, Traci M. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
